Today Cindy Sheehan is still outside of George Bush's place. Today more people died violently in Iraq. Today those in power had their cocktails and checked their portfolios. Today I am sitting here, looking at my emotions and finding various different geographies being traversed.
Ted Samsel commented on my post yesterday that Tom Robbins,
Another Roadside Attraction, spoke to the same general material that the
DaVinci Code does, and that it is funnier. But that is exactly why it has never bothered the Church. It's a small hip book that could be ignored. I have complained in this space previously about
the DaVinci Code, so you already know that I find Dan Brown an irritating prevaricator, who can use this information/disinformation to write a fast-moving piece of schtick, but when push comes to shove it always turns out to be the lone gunman of the piece: someone who is slightly nuts. The Church isn't worried about the outcome of the book. They are worried
the DaVinci Codeis reminding people all over the place that there are plenty of lies in the bedrock of the xtian religion.
Ted also notes that the
DVC, as he calls it, has been debunked by this person and that. No doubt true. What it made me think about, though, is how the New Testament could never really stand up to the same sort of debunking ritual, but that you will never see that program on the Discovery Channel. The xtians would shut the place down. As a matter of fact, you will also never see a discussion of why certain aspects of the Q'uran reflect the Prophet's rather prodigious sexual appetite. You will never see the debunking of those lies that underpin this culture and most of the middle east and the west. Only the oriental culture could accept a real discussion of facts about these issues. That's why Sun Myung Moon moved here from Korea, where he would never have remained so untouched, allowed to go on in his madness, raking in the chips from the cows of unquestioning xtians.
I was never a big Tom Robbins fan, myself. Though I like the one,
Jitterbug Perfume, and I accept that he is a great writer. You can't get everything. I don't care for Led Zeppelin, either, but they must be doing great art, so many people I respect say so.
So, in the interest of telling the absolute truth about myself, and in describing where I am today of all days, I must bring up Lesley Gore. Today, half an hour ago, I bought (online) Lesley Gore's new CD. Her first in 25 years. You may ask why I would do such a thing, and I have to admit it stumps me too. Is this an act of nostalgia? Is it an act of petty fandom? Do I wish to return to my sixties roots?
Let me say this: I am a big Lesley Gore fan. I have most of her vinyl lps. I know people primarily remember her for "It's My Party." Not my favorite cut by any means, but a decent pop song of its era. I point out that her second highest rated single was the first true feminist song of the modern era: "You Don't Own Me." A rather daring statement for its time. In some ways, along with the folk music movement, and the british invasion, it certainly ushered in the time of great change that was the sixties.
These sides were mainly produced by Quincy Jones. They were smart, well crafted pop songs. Listening to them is a sociological exploration of dating mores of the time. And there is a lot of heart in those songs. She was seventeen when Party hit the airwaves and she spent the rest of her childhood riding that wave. Good stuff. I particularly like the albums,
My Town, My Guy and Me, and
California Nights.
I have to give credit to my younger brother Greg for turning me on to Lesley Gore in the first place. I remember going over to his room, across the stairway from mine, to listen to "Sunshine, Lollipops, and Rainbows," a real piece of fluff if there ever was one. But we bought lps, not singles, so I heard a bunch of her stuff and I thought, man this girl can really make these songs work. This was about the time we were waiting patiently for
Sergeant Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band to hit town. We were calling the record stores every day for weeks before the big event.
When we were small I thought my brother Greg and myself were pretty close. But it turned out I didn't know what I was talking about. Greg essentially quit talking to me about 1973. I saw him at my folks' funerals in 1994 and 1995 and he was weirder than ever. But there you are. There are just some folks you really don't know what is going on inside of them. He was a bitter kid, and I wouldn't be surprised to find out he is a pretty bitter man.
But I'll always think about him when I put on Lesley. I owe him for that. And for a lot of other things. I have no idea how to talk to him, communicate with him, or whether it would make any difference if I did. I have such a cruel, weird family. I know a great deal of that comes from the way my mother made us all compete. She was completely about triumphalism. Either you made her triumphant in the market place of old ladies and their families, or you got pushed to the side while she worked up some new plans for how to save you and her face.
Greg ended up a lawyer in Los Angeles. I hope he's doing okay. He had one daughter in his one marriage (that lasted seventeen years), and she, Molly, has graduated from college and is interning in a medical research program. So, at least one thing has gone well for him.
I've had Wichita on the mind lately. The BTK killer's hearing reminds me of those days. That guy got started right about the time Greg and I left town. But I can't help but think about all the torture stories I heard in grade school from the nuns. Not all the nuns, just certain ones. They were obsessed by the martyrs, and by the use/acceptance of pain in the pursuit of grace. Now I recognize, from the lofty heights of adulthood, that there was some serious S&M'ers among these folks. I had this one nun, Henrietta, in the sixth grade, who specialised in stories about torture and rape and keeping yourself pure. Whoof. What effect did that sort of thing have on this BTK guy? Oh, I know he didn't hear it, wasn't catholic, had his own demons. Still, all xtianity is infected with that pain is part of sex, pain is good, pain makes you a stronger person. Creepy shit, we know it is. I don't hear Pope Benny saying anything different, either. He's obviously a guy deep into pain. Like Mel Gibson.
I personally don't think you can learn that much from suffering. You can help yourself to a greater personal understanding by examining your pain. But, that business about pain tempering the steel is just a load of bullshit from people who are actually getting off on it (giving and getting). I know, lately I keep saying that all of our problems are essentially coming from sexual dysfunction. I don't hear any real argument out there.
And one more note about Dan Brown. I read his novel,
Digital Fortress in New Hampshire. It was on my father-in-law's shelf and I jumped through it, riding around the country, in a couple of days. It's about the NSA and encryption software. As usual the so-called hero ends up sort of the bad guy. I found myself politically on the side of the terrorists in this book. It was an all or nothing sort of deal. Either the NSA should have carte blanche (and no one has the right to any real privacy), or the bad guys will rule the world. It's amazing that this guy is considered in any way liberal or radical. He's a major league hack. Yes, he's good at what he does. But is there anything he believes in anywhere at all in history or the world? I don't think so.
I started
Harry Potter and the Half Blood Prince when we got back to town and was immediately struck by how far from Dan Brown Jo Rawlings really is. I can tell what she believes on nearly every page. And as a stylist she blows him completely out of the water.
Once again, I thank the Lady for Her grace and Her mercy. The days flow around the wheel. Autumn approaches. I hear Jane Morrel's voice in my head: "Here it is Autumn/the Color disks are whirling . . ."