Been reading some Rita Mae Brown books. Mainly her mysteries. The ones with the cats and dog (Mrs. Murphy, Pewter, and Tee Tucker, the Corgi). Also I read one of the Fox hunting books, with the powerful character Sister Jane. Finally I just finished a novel called
Venus Envy, which came with a bunch of RMB books I bought off of ebay. It's a look at a woman, coming out in her mid 30s after being told she had terminal lung cancer. She writes a bunch of letters to everyone in her life and tells all. The next day she finds out the hospital got the wrong x-ray report and she's just got bronchitis. Too late, of course, for the letters.
This is a mixed bag of a book. Paige and I have been reading the Mrs. Murphy books for at least the last ten years. Most of them I bought when they appeared, often in hardbound at significant money. When Paige first was reading them I did too because I tried to read whatever she was reading, listen to whatever she was listening to, and the same with movies and tv. Eventually I couldn't keep up and there are many places Paige has gone that I haven't. Likewise I am sure.
In any case, this book is way different than the Mrs. Murphy mysteries. Those books talk about sex and love and relationships, but this novel is quite explicit and out front about sexuality. Rita Mae was originally famous in the 1970s for a novel called
Rubyfruit Jungle. It was perhaps the first widely popular openly lesbian book at a time when gay people were rebelling against the way things were. I never read it. I had no problem with it, I just never read that particular book. I have always in my life had at least one close friend who I knew was gay, going back to grade school. Why it is such an issue for the religious folks I do not know. I suppose if you think that sex is only about procreation then gay sex simply doesn't fit into your cultural plans. But the days of few people are way way past and most of us understand that sex and sexuality is more a question of mental health than anything else.
Venus Envy. Good title with its mild joke. The heroine of the book is from an upper class Virginia family. Her mother is a terrible nag and her father is quite removed. Her brother is a drunken loser. She herself runs a successful art dealership that specializes in paintings of hunting and sportsmanship. She has an african-american assistant who is one of the few people who actually care about her. She is closeted but has her 'boyfriend' who goes to events with her. And his boyfriend goes to events with one of her girlfriends. A way of doing things that has existed for many centuries.
Coming out in upper class Virginia (and this is 1995 folks) is apparently not a good thing to do. Particularly among the women. There are the usual incidents. And Frazier's relationship with her mother goes from pretty bad to far worse. Interestingly enough her coming out ultimately helps both her father and her brother repairs damaged lives and confront their own failings. So the men get better and the women turn into dark, mean figures, intent on hurting her.
What does this mean? I liked this book in many ways. Frazier's internal dialogue as she tries to figure out why it worked this way and what she is actually about, are good stuff, the kind of stuff we should all be telling ourselves. I thought this book was valuable for this aspect. Where it gets weird is a complicated several chapters episode at the end wherein Frazier, having fallen from a ladder, passes out and ends up spending some quality time on Mt. Olympus with the greek/roman gods and goddess. To the extent that she has a hot time with Venus and Adonis. In explicit detail. There is some very 1960s ruminations on the nature of sexuality in the human animal (you should be able to fuck anybody any time if it is good for you and for them, never mind the externalities of it all). This is mainly just weird, though as a fantasy sequence it does allow you into Brown's mind. I found it odd, not because of the sex, but because I couldn't really see what she was striving for, using this imagined sequence.
What happens when things turn supernatural? I have struggled with that question myself in my novels. I can't write those Steven King things, because I can't really justify the supernatural. I think it does have something to do with growing up Roman Catholic and hearing all those superstitious stories along the way. Now I tend to the rational (and I know I have the Goddess trip, so sue me). So the use of the device doesn't quite work for me. If she hadn't done the ground work of making it be real and not imagined, then maybe. But she has scenes in which the painting these figures are in seems to come alive not just for Frazier but for her assistant as well. So you don't get to write it off as merely a bump on the head induced vision.
In any case I don't envy Venus here. Brown's stories are often set among the upper class. They are all in Virginia. She uses her books to whine about the government and taxes although she never actually grasps the problems there. She's socially liberal, but she wants to keep "her money" because she worked hard for it. It is an irritating feature of her work. She complains about being poor but she has numerous horses and she's the Master of a foxhunt, not a cheap enterprise. I know she's not rich rich, but it is kind of a pain in the ass to read this stuff. It is the stuff of right wing radio, though she is a lesbian and an arts person. It shows the depth of penetration that self-interest has in this society of individuals. Of course, she's also a gay person who never had children. She's not really connected though she says she is. Or maybe she doesn't understand that being connected means paying your fair share and even more if you are doing well.
Finally this book, set in 1995, talks about present economic conditions as if the world is falling apart. It reminds us of the savings and loan scandals of the 80s and it goes on and on about how it can't last (the economic health of our society). This is 1995! I just wonder how she's feeling these days?
So, it's a mixed review from me. Worth reading for the introspection. You can skip through the tirades about wealth and power. I do agree that being gay in that kind of society must reek. She does always talk about how great Virginia is, though it doesn't sound that great to me. It reminds me of the kind of "pride" that Texans have about Texas and that most of the south seems to need. You know,
it is so great here. Better than up north. People don't talk like that in Illinois or in New Hampshire. I really think it is a confidence thing. I think the southerners are defensive, post Civil War. As for Texas, they gave us George W. Bush, but they also gave us Molly Ivins and Ann Richards. No place is that great and no place is that bad. Still, Mississippi is the most racist state in the Union. Can't wait for my next visit.
May the Lady's Mercy see us through this terrible time.
Labels: gay, Rita Mae Brown, Rubyfruit Jungle, Venus Envy